|
 

MU researchers are investigating
the possibility that pets could be a source of multi-resistant
bacterial infections in humans. Photo courtesy of PD
Photo.org.
|
Sick?
Maybe Your Pet
Is to Blame
By Christian Basi
The next time you have difficulty fighting a bacterial infection,
your next trip to the doctor might be to the family veterinarian.
A new University of Missouri-Columbia study is investigating whether
the family pet could be a reservoir for infections of multi-resistant
bacteria in humans.
Antibiotic resistant bacteria are a growing
problem in the medical profession as doctors are prescribing second
and third choice medicines when common antibiotics don't work.
In many cases, these other medicines might be less effective or
cause more side effects. One particular type of bacterium, Methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which can be fatal in humans, is
the focus of a new research project led by MU veterinarians
Stephanie Kottler, Leah Cohn and John Middleton.
"We used to think of these antibiotic-resistant
infections as a health care issue that appeared in post-operative
or long-term patients," said Kottler, a resident at the MU
Veterinary Medical Teaching
Hospital. "However, we have been seeing more of these
infections that have been acquired throughout the general population,
or 'community acquired' infections. It's important to know what
environmental factors might be encouraging or prolonging these
infections."
MRSA bacteria can live in the noses or on
the skin of humans and animals where it might not produce any
symptoms. The bacteria become dangerous when they enter the tissue
through a cut or puncture, producing a serious infection. In some
cases, the bacteria can cause life-threatening problems, such
as bloodstream infections or pneumonia. While the infections are
most often found in patients after hospitalization, there is an
increasing occurrence of community-acquired infections among prison
populations, sports teams, military personnel and the general
public. Kottler believes that pets might be an important factor
behind the increase in community-acquired infections.
MRSA rates have increased dramatically since
the 1970s. In 1974, MRSA infections accounted for two percent
of the total number of staphylococcal infections; in 1995 it was
22 percent, and in 2004, it was 63 percent, according to the Centers
for Disease Control.
"This study will help us evaluate the
various risk factors associated with this problem," said
Middleton, an associate professor of food animal internal medicine.
"Are pets a risk factor? This study will help us track where
the disease started and determine what questions the physician
should be asking if a patient is diagnosed with MRSA."
Currently, the Mizzou researchers, aided by
J. Scott Weese, an assistant professor at the University of Guelph
Ontario Veterinary College in Canada, are taking samples from
750 to 800 pairs of owners and pets. To date, they have collected
about 500 samples and are sorting them into three groups: human
health care workers and pets, veterinary health care workers and
pets, and non-health care professionals and pets.
The study is being funded by the American
College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Foundation and the MU
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery.
Archives
| Comments | Home SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe
| Change Your
Address | Unsubscribe
Copyright © 2007 — Curators of the University of Missouri
DMCA and other copyright information.
All rights reserved.
An equal opportunity/ADA institution.
Published by the Mizzou Alumni Association
Questions? Comments? E-mail comments@mizzoualumni.org
Last Update:
November 15, 2007
|